On Nov 27, 2005, at 11:21 a, Miguel wrote:

I am considering additional changes to the way that applets are invoked.

Jmol web page developers who are using the Jmol.js JavaScript library will
be insulated from these changes.

Web applications developers who are *not* using Jmol.js are encouraged to
contact me on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list to discuss
these planned changes and to discuss their motivation for not using
Jmol.js


hi Miguel,

I do not use Jmol.js routinely, though I do on occasion and I recommend it to most folks. my own reasons:

1. I had much of the same functionality already built before Jmol.js.
2. many of my pages use a combination of technologies and that does not mesh well with Jmol.js.
3. I use callbacks.
4. I find the Jmol.js code difficult to trace, which is frustrating when debugging. 5. I found Jmol.js hampered what I wanted to do for advanced javascripting. this is not surprising, since it is designed to make Jmol implementation as easy as possible for novices.

<curmudgeony>
6. I believe that writing html with javascript should be done only when it can not be avoided.
</curmedgeony>


;-)

tim
--
Timothy Driscoll em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
molvisions - see. grasp. learn.                     ph: 919-368-2667
<http://www.molvisions.com/>                        im: molvisions
usa:virginia:blacksburg tx: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to