> Phil wrote:
> 
> > ... I honestly can't see that there is a need to force a
> > special radius for that N...neither for calculating bonds nor for
> > spacefill display...since the formal charge doesn't enter into those
> > matters at all.
> 
> I'm getting more confused.
> 
> The formal charge *does* enter into the bonding radius.

Not to the best of my understanding, and I'll dare to argue with the
code-meister.

As I know it, as currently implemented in Jmol, the charge listed in pdb
column 79-80 is taken as ionic charge, or oxidation state, of that atom,
then compared against a table of ionic radii. If a match in charge is
found, then that ionic radius is used in the bonding-by-proximity
calculations and spacefill ionic display.  (And we learned over the past
year, that bonding-by-proximity calculations with Fe3+, Al3+, Si4+,
etc., fail b/c the radius of the neutral atom is _way_ too different
than the ionic radii and therefore way too big and therefore creates
2x-4x extraneous bonds, and impossible bonds at that.)

To make it clear, from the chemistry side, the table of radii has
*nothing* to do with formal charge and everything to do with ionic
charge. Sometimes the ionic charge and the formal charge (btw, usually
zero on most atoms, but most common non-zero values I would guess to be
+1 and -1) may be identical values on a particular atom, but most often
not. As I stated before, the PDB Guide's example of the charge field
certainly leads one to believe that the ionic charge, or oxidation
state, was the intent of the format, hence MG2+ and FE3+ in the example.

Getting back to the start point on this issue, the original petition was
simply that  charges that don't have a match in the ionic radius table
don't get overwritten with zero. And that should be fairly simply
accomodated without upsetting the cart on all the good things that can
be done with the ionic charge in cols 79-80.

More questions? How about a phone call?

--Phil


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to