does anyone know why in the labels for atoms we are pulling in something called the "modelTagNumber"?

My guess is that in PDB files you have

MODEL          3

in a PDB file, then the idea is to indicate that number instead of the sequential number in the file (1, 2, 3, ....).

For example, if you label an atom with %M (the model number) or you click on an atom and look at the status line, if there are multiple models you will see:

whatever /[THIS NUMBER]

But that's not the number you actually need to access that model (I don't think).

Furthermore, with XYZ files, what's happening is that the second line of XYZ files is going into that same variable. So, if you have a MULTIPLE model file that has, say, at the top:

23
this is my information
<atom definitions here>

and then you load that model and click on an atom, you see something like:

C 1/this is my information


My questions:

1) Is it intentional that the number after the / in an atom description in a PDB file identifies the number in the MODEL record instead of 1+m, where m is the index of the model in the file, 0, 1, 2, ...?

2) Is it important that it do so?

3) Why is the information in the second line of an XYZ file being put in this same variable?

4) I want to fix this. What do you recommend I do about it?


Bob

--

Robert M. Hanson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 507-646-3107
Professor of Chemistry, St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave., Northfield, MN 55057
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr

"Imagination is more important than knowledge."  - Albert Einstein



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to