Rolf wrote:
> For me it doesn't look like a duplicate. It was just an update. That's
> at least what the Sourceforge site told ("Successfully Updated
> 1450490")and what I intended.
> I just added an extract of the biological unit file of '1p84' that is
> small enough to be accepted by Sourceforge, like Nico requested it.
>
> Regards, Rolf
It looks like to me that there are two bugs with the same title and
subject content.
So, I am confused as to the status of this. I was unable to reproduce the
problem using the sample file that was attached. And it looked like
someone else was working on the other bug #.
Q: So, if you check out from the current svn, is this working for you or not?
Miguel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
