[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bob,
Yes, Wiki should be secure: all modifications are saved and you can restore a
page to any of its previous version.
"reactive" security is not good enough in my mind. This is a major
concern. I don't want to see anything messed up for even a minute. We
should think long and hard about this before replacing docbook with wiki.
Bob
There's a MySQL database behind it that keeps all the versions.
So, if a spammer starts deleting the content of some pages, it's possible to
revert the pages to their previous content.
Wiki is secure? No chance of uninvited company destroying it?
I'm nervous about that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, the wiki will be easier than DocBook for having the documentation
updated and enhanced by everyone.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
