> I just wasn't that interested in rehashing a discussion that I thought > we already completed. I don't think it matters. I'm just going through > the punch list, and this is one thing that was on the list but didn't > appear, so I was wondering.
OK > If it proves to be a problem and people > say, "well, that's great, but how the heck do I get the new bonds to > be a certain color, we can look at it then. Probably I'm the only one > in the world who cares. In going through the email archive I see that, after some discussion, Jan eventually agreed with you: Jan wrote: Now I'm convinced that the most straight forward solution is an optional diameter parameter to the connect command, though in most cases I would render bonds on a per residue level with the wireframe command and not on a bond type level with connect. Regards, Jan At this point, I think that we should wait, see what people's reaction is, and add it in a future release if desired. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
