NO! please :) We can talk about it if you want, but it was totally unnecessary. The good thing, I suppose, is that it all breaks in a "can't compile" way, but I would really appreciate it if we did NOT commit at any point code that breaks the SVN. I've undone that Point3fi commit on my local machine. Unless you really feel it's important and want to take the time yourself to go through all the code and revise, I'd rather not have it there. Or, if I'm mistaken and it's really a piece of cake, let me know. What I was finding were things now like:
atom1.distance(atom2) in place of atom1.point3f.distance(atom2.point3f) Should atom1.distance(atom2) work? Bob Nicolas Vervelle wrote: >Should we import Point3fi class into 10.9 branch ? >The class was created by Miguel to simplify code on Atom (treated like a >Point3f) > >http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jmol?view=rev&revision=5072 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-developers mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
