The merge is not easy in fact: some of your changes are in the same area. If it's not useful, I leave it as it is
Bob Hanson wrote: > Hmm. That's a good question. This was Miguel's rewrite of my compiler > change to allow for multiple expressions. It was nice, but the compiler > is working fine for multiple expressions; maybe we should leave it out. > It would not add anything new, I think, just make the code cleaner. But > I have worked on the compiler some since then, so I'm a bit reticent to > put it in. You could try it. If > > load caffeine.xyz;connect 3.5 (oxygen) (hydrogen) hbond create; > > works, then I guess it's fine. > > Bob > > > > > Nicolas Vervelle wrote: > > >> Should we merge this one ? >> "reintroduce compiler support for multiple embedded expressions" >> http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jmol?view=rev&revision=4838 >> >> I don't know why it was done. >> >> Nico >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
