What's the rationale behind having JmolApplet[0-6].jar vis-a-vis JmolApplet.jar itself? Is there supposed to be some advantage to using JmolApplet0.jar instead of JmolApplet.jar? I guess I was under the impression that perhaps only a subset of 0-6 would load initially, but I see from my server log that they are all delivered in quick succession. Is it actually faster one way or the other? Is there a way, perhaps, to have a minimal subset of Jmol load initially, and then have other parts load later?
Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
