Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> Bob Hanson wrote:
> > the revision numbers change more rapidly than the release
> > numbers.

You change the version number almost always with a change in
the development tree. There is no "real" release you do. So
IMHO there is no big difference between release and revision
numbers here. So I thought, that using the global
Release-version as minor version number probably more fits this
behaviour. It would even allow a faster bug-tracking in the
development tree, if the user can provide the revision number in
the bug-report.

> Yes, and it still requires to modify JmolConstants.java (or to force 
> commit) to update the $..$ fields.

No. I spoke about the global Release-number SVN provides (SVN
counts up the Release number, as you know). AFAIK
it is possible to get this one. $Release$ may be the wrong
keyword for it.

Regards, Daniel
-- 
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to