> > >plus the article quotes Henry Rzepa, which means it must be on-topic >as well as authoritative. :-) >
It simply means I had an opportunity to send the message that comparing 3D coordinates needed availability of such! There is a sensible question I could pose here (or to the developers). How easily could a robot of any kind "detect" Jmol coordinates? It would have to parse the load entry in the script line, and that line I suppose is parsable using a suitable regex expression. Another, more explicit way of identifying a molecule is to use a "handle", ie http://dx.doi.org/10042/to-116, which like the prefix implies, is similar to a DOI, and one name for which could be a COI (that is still being discussed). So my question would be; to assist in robotic discovery, how best could one incorporate any such object identifier in the Jmol invocation? Or,more generally, should there (is there?) any explicit metadata declared to assist robotic harvesting? The "COI" by the way derives from a Cambridge/Imperial digital repository project. -- Henry Rzepa. +44 (020) 7594 5774 (Voice); +44 (0870) 132 3747 (eFax); [EMAIL PROTECTED] (iChat) http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/ Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK. (Voracious anti-spam filter in operation for received email. If expected reply not received, please phone/fax). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
