Bugs item #1699436, was opened at 2007-04-12 13:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379133&aid=1699436&group_id=23629

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Scripting
Group: v11
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Gary Kedziora (gkedziora)
Assigned to: Miguel (migueljmol)
Summary: Large MO Coefficients

Initial Comment:
This is for Version 11.1.9

Parsing MOs from Gaussian Pop=Full does not work for large MO coeffients, which 
are common when diffuse basis functions are used.  When the coefficient becomes 
smaller than -100 then two number run together in the columns.  For example, 

 105        4S        -71.16107-104.21841 

This can be fixed, but there may be other large coefficients that can not be 
fixed by changing the output parser, so I recommend that the program exits 
gracefully when such a situation is encountered and allows visualization of the 
already read orbitals.  This is not a bad compromise since the MOs with large 
coefficients are high energy virtuals anyway.  

I tried using Pop=Regular, but that didn't work either, and the error message 
wasn't very helpful.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379133&aid=1699436&group_id=23629

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to