Egon Willighagen a écrit : > On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Nicolas Vervelle > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Apart from simply being up to date, I think the main advantage is that the >> new LGPL is compatible with more other licenses (Apache license for >> example). http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html >> That will let us use more external libraries if needed, and also will >> clarify the situation with some libraries we are already using (especially >> Jakarta Commons CLI which is under Apache license, normally not compatible >> with LGPL v2.1) >> > > Indeed... we still use Apache libs for the application... > > Does the LGPL v3 licenses have any effect on how web pages may use it? > Different than with 2.1? > For what I understand, LGPL v3 doesn't impose more constraints on regular uses than v2.1, it's only more protective against things like tivoization, software patents, DRM, ... which shouldn't be any problem for Jmol users
Nico ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
