cc: cdk-devel

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  On Mar 23, 2008, at 2:16 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
>  > Unless this would happen... though this would require everyone who
>  > every contributed to the code to agree with this, including the
>  > authors of the original babel code,
>
>  Tim and I have already explicitly stated our approval that LGPL is
>  fine for the force field classes. I believe the jmol-developers list
>  may have bounced that message since I'm not a member of the list.

I haven't seen a bounce message...

>  There's no need to worry about the "authors of the original babel
>  code." The force field classes are highly self-contained. Bob has
>  essentially taken just the bits that Tim and I (and mostly Tim) added
>  to Open Babel.

Oh, really? I am really happy to hear that! I'm sure the CDK will have
a close look at the code too then!

Egon

-- 
----
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to