> I think you misunderstand my suggestion. I don't mean to include those files > in the JAR. I mean to include them in the folder that contains all the > JmolApplet*.jar files, just the way we now include Jmol.js, or in a subfolder.
Yes. But even so, the download will become too large a file, and quite a confusion for users. At first I thought this was a good idea, but now I think that given the total size and number of files, separate downloads for Jmol and JSmol is a better idea. On the other hand, Jonathan, I do not see JSmol as a convenient alternative to the applet in computers (yet). The responsiveness, although good, is not as smooth as for the applet. And on platforms like the iPad, which is a target for JSmol, large models (proteins) are still hard to rotate and so in JSmol. Therefore I think that where Java is available the applet will not be displaced. The beauty, of course, is to be able to make the pages load whatever alternative depending on the platform, as Bob has demonstrated. That is our target. Still it can be managed with two downloads. Just thinking aloud :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
