On Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:01:47 -0500 Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu> wrote: > I'm waiting for your answer: > > *Does it need to be "build.xml" or can it be another name?*
Yes, it can be another name. And even if this weren't supported by Ant, the renaming is something one can do in the package build scripts anyway. The main problem is that there is no script in the tarball at all. On Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:10:02 -0500 Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu> wrote: > never mind. It was all due to my changing the name to "build-stable.xml" > which I hoped would help me keep track of things better; it's fixed as SVN. > I'll release 13.2.9 sometime next week with that fix in it. OK? Yes, that would be great, thanks. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
