Hi Bob,
I wonder whether we should take this to the jmol-developers list instead.
The 59 problems listed are only java warnings of type 'Java Problem'.
My old installation had a build folder that would end up with the Jmol.jar file
in it (so I could run it outside the development environment as well). This new
version indeed puts all kinds of class files in the bin folder, and the org an
com folders with the hierarchy all they way down to class files. No Jmol.jar
file, though. I even created build/classes in the folder in the work space, so
I don't get the copy error anymore, but still no Jmol.jar file in my build
folder either.
The compliance setting as 1.7, so I put it do 1.6, which makes that it can't
even compile anymore because I seem to have in the build path only JRE System
Library [Java SE 7 [1.7.0_80]] available, so I set it back to 1.7 (since that
way I can at least compile and run the app from within eclipse).
So I am still stuck...
René
On Apr 11, 2016, at 5:54 PM, Bob Hanson
<hans...@users.sf.net<mailto:hans...@users.sf.net>> wrote:
I am using JDK1.8.0_73
Make sure you are using compiler compliance level 1.6.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Bob Hanson
hans...@users.sf.net<mailto:hans...@users.sf.net> wrote:
I'm still using Eclipse Juno Version: 4.2.2.
I don't know about "classes" directory - In my case that is bin. Must be a
series of problems reported -- check the Problems page.
[image: Inline image 1]
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Rene Kanters
rkant...@users.sf.net<mailto:rkant...@users.sf.net> wrote:
Hi,
I saw the commit that fixed the problem. That is great!
I have a different problem now though with using Eclipse Mars 2 in that I
am not able to create the Jmol.jar file there. I can run the project, but I
want to be able to have students in the research group use the fixed
version of the Jmol.jar file. When I do a build I get the following
messages in the console:
Buildfile: /Users/rkanters/Documents/workspace/Jmol/build-eclipse.xml
copyClasses:
[copy] Warning: /Users/rkanters/Documents/workspace/Jmol/build/classes
does not exist.
postBuild:
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 245 milliseconds
I was able to do this with the Juno version of Eclipse, but since I could
not get updates from sourceforge for the project, I decided to start
completely fresh with the latest and greatest...
Anybody know how to build the jar file with Mars 2?
________________________________
* [bugs:#577]<https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/>
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/ MOs only shown
for first model*
Status: open
Group: v10
Created: Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:18 PM UTC by Rene Kanters
Last Updated: Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:18 PM UTC
Owner: nobody
Attachments:
* ROHF_ROHF_6-31Gd.out
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/attachment/ROHF_ROHF_6-31Gd.out
(114.4 kB; application/octet-stream)
* ROHF_ROHF_ccpVDZ.out
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/attachment/ROHF_ROHF_ccpVDZ.out
(123.4 kB; application/octet-stream)
I have noticed that when I read qchem output where I have MOs in more than
one model they display for both if I used a 6-31Gd basis set, but if I use
cc-pVDZ only the MOs of the first model shows. I attached the qchem 4.3
output from two calculations where the only difference is the basis set
used.
By the way, I checked that the same problem exists with output from qchem
3.1.
________________________________
Sent from sourceforge.net<http://sourceforge.net> because you indicated
interest in
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
--
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
Chair, Department of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.
-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
* [bugs:#577]<https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/>
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/ MOs only shown
for first model*
Status: open
Group: v10
Created: Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:18 PM UTC by Rene Kanters
Last Updated: Mon Apr 11, 2016 08:36 PM UTC
Owner: nobody
Attachments:
* ROHF_ROHF_6-31Gd.out
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/attachment/ROHF_ROHF_6-31Gd.out
(114.4 kB; application/octet-stream)
* ROHF_ROHF_ccpVDZ.out
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/attachment/ROHF_ROHF_ccpVDZ.out
(123.4 kB; application/octet-stream)
I have noticed that when I read qchem output where I have MOs in more than
one model they display for both if I used a 6-31Gd basis set, but if I use
cc-pVDZ only the MOs of the first model shows. I attached the qchem 4.3
output from two calculations where the only difference is the basis set
used.
By the way, I checked that the same problem exists with output from qchem
3.1.
________________________________
Sent from sourceforge.net<http://sourceforge.net> because you indicated
interest in
https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
--
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
Chair, Department of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.
-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
________________________________
[bugs:#577]<https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/> MOs only shown for first
model
Status: open
Group: v10
Created: Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:18 PM UTC by Rene Kanters
Last Updated: Mon Apr 11, 2016 08:36 PM UTC
Owner: nobody
Attachments:
*
ROHF_ROHF_6-31Gd.out<https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/attachment/ROHF_ROHF_6-31Gd.out>
(114.4 kB; application/octet-stream)
*
ROHF_ROHF_ccpVDZ.out<https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/attachment/ROHF_ROHF_ccpVDZ.out>
(123.4 kB; application/octet-stream)
I have noticed that when I read qchem output where I have MOs in more than one
model they display for both if I used a 6-31Gd basis set, but if I use cc-pVDZ
only the MOs of the first model shows. I attached the qchem 4.3 output from two
calculations where the only difference is the basis set used.
By the way, I checked that the same problem exists with output from qchem 3.1.
________________________________
Sent from sourceforge.net<http://sourceforge.net> because you indicated
interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/bugs/577/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
