Thank you again for the reply. Just a few comments.

From: "E.L. Willighagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol can accept ABINIT v.4.x.x outputs ?
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:40:08 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> On Wednesday 15 October 2003 11:35, Masayoshi Mikami wrote:
> > Thank you (Dank U) for the quick reply, and please accept
> > my apology about sending the big-sized e-mail (70KB).
> > (I might have overlooked the warning about the e-mail size
> >  limitation (< 40KB).)
> 
> No problem. It's something we need to do to fight spam... :(

Thanks for the relief.

> > From: "E.L. Willighagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol can accept ABINIT v.4.x.x outputs ?
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:08:31 +0200
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > On Wednesday 15 October 2003 09:40, Masayoshi Mikami wrote:
> > > > I have confirmed that the latest Jmol v.8
> > > > now accepts *_CML.xml format (CML files for solids)
> > > > used in ABINIT ( http://www.abinit.org/ ).
> > > > ABINITioners will appreciate the feature very much.
> > >
> > > About the files you attached: may we put these in Jmol CVS, and
> > > distribute them? In addition, could you also send the output in CML
> > > format, so that I can add that one too to CVS?
> >
> > Yes, please distribute them. They are typical reference outputs
> > archived in the tar.gz balls which are freely available.
> 
> Ok, thanx.
> 
> > For the CML input files that I tried, they can be found
> > at the following URL:
> >     http://www.abinit.org/ABINIT/Tests/Test_v3/
> > Kindly notice t68.in_CML.xml, t69a.in_CML.xml, and t69b.in_CML.xml.
> 
> What are the differences between them?

The explanation of the input files, taken from README:

 68. Slab of Mo (see Test_v1#41) 
     Test the reading of a CML file 

 69. Dataset 1 : C supercell with a vacancy
     Dataset 2 : Si surface + water molecules (see Test_v1#42)
     Test the reading of two CML files

Jmol v.8 now accept the CML files at last ! (NB: v.7 did not)

> > > > Now I have noticed that the Jmol can accept
> > > > the output format of v.3.x.x only, not of v.4.x.x.
> > >
> > > Thanx for the diff! That is very useful. I've filed a bug for this as
> > > Jmol's SourceForge website.
> >
> > Thank you (Dank U) !
> 
> ;) Waar heeft u Nederlands leren spreken?

"Nee," unfortunately... I always consult with a book 
"Around the World with 80 words" by Charles Berlitz
(the grandson of the founder of the "Berlitz" language school)
when I write e-mails, by checking the nation code (e.g. ".nl"). ;-)

> > > > I will enclose an example taken from ~ABINIT/Test_v4/Refs/t01.out;
> > > > the other reference outputs are available in the ABINIT tar.gz
> > > > ball as ~ABINIT/Test*/Refs/* (here "~ABINIT" denotes the location
> > > > where the archive is extracted).
> > > > The diff file (diff t01.out of v.3.4.6 and that of v.4.2.2) is
> > > > cited below. For your reference, the t01.out files of the both
> > > > version are attached.
> > > >
> > > > Any remedies would be highly appreciated to treat v.4.x.x
> > > > outputs with Jmol.
> > >
> > > The problem will be looked at.
> 
> I'll try not to forget to send an email when it is fixed. But it should at 
> least be fixed in the next release.
>
> Egon
> 
> -- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PhD on Molecular Representation in Chemometrics
> Nijmegen University
> http://www.cac.sci.kun.nl/people/egonw/
> GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6

I remain very grateful (Dat is heel vriendelijk van U !),

Yours, 
Masayoshi Mikami


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to