>> Q: For the purposes of Jmol, do we care?
>
> I'm not sure if Jmol is used for making publication ready graphics... I
> think  there are better programs for that, e.g. Povray...

I agree. But since Jmol will be used for teaching purposes, I was thinking
that it might be better to avoid a format which was 'less acceptable' to
IUPAC, etc.


>> Q: Is there an acceptable graphical representation for aromatic bonds
>> that does not require me to calculate the inside of the ring?
>
> I guess you even need it for inner ring dotted bonds...

That is correct.
I need to calculate which side is dotted. And it changes depending upon
the rotation of the model.

It probably won't be difficult to do, but I was looking/hoping for an easy
solution :-)


Miguel





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to