Herbert wrote: > The distinction between oldunix and oldwindows is simply a recognition > of the fact that they don't work precisely the same way.
I see. > A dotted notation is OK by me. I would say that the dotted notation would only make sense if there really is a true hierarchy of options. >> >> where setup would be the name of a "standard" set of default >> >> settings all packaged together (e.g. oldunix, oldwindows, >> >> newcommon, etc.) Now that I reread this, maybe there really isn't a hierarchy. Other than oldunix, oldwindows, newcommon, what did you have in mind? Separately, we may want to avoid words like 'old' and 'new' ... what is new today quickly becomes old :-) Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
