Herbert wrote: > The fine-grained set of commands is just as easy to implement as the > broader set
Hmmm ... while it may be 'just as easy' for you, it is not quite as easy for me :-) [snip] > However, on reflection, I would suggest > > extending > set axes [x <boolean>] [y <boolean>] [z <boolean>] > to > set axes [signed|unsigned] > [[+|-]x <boolean>] [[+|-]y <boolean>] [[+|-]z <boolean>] > > to allow display of half axes if desired. (See below for > signed|unsigned). Regarding the display of half-axes, I would like to see if others think there is value. > With respect to just treating the windows Y-label as a bug, I agree that > it is a bug, but, since it really does change the image, and somebody > might care, what is the harm in allowing them to recreate what they are > used to. Personally, I would say that if they like the version with the bug then they should keep using the version that has the bug. > With respect to signed labels, I would add the optional flags "signed" > or "unsigned" to the set axes commands. This would have the nice effect > of allowing the people who are used to the windows Y label placement to > keep it, but also to add a minus sign so that it would also be an > accurate label. The it would no longer be a bug. I like signed|unsigned Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
