>>Also, the labelling is done too. >> >>I do not really understand what you want with Insertion codes. >> >> > they are necessary to characterize a group 1hag Gly1^F in contrast to > Gly1^D > >>What should the behavior be for %i ? >> >> > as it is, the atom serial number
OK ... see below >>What should the behavior be for %I ? >> >> > the insertion code You want %I to *only* be the insertion code? That means that every time you use this you are going to say label %i%I >>Why shouldn't %i always show the insertion code? >> >> > it is already the atom serial number (according to RasMol2.7.2.1 doc, > but %I is an undocumented side effect. Jan, I don't think I agree with this. The 'atom serial number' never makes sense by itself. It only makes sense with the insertion code. Therefore I really think that %i should display the serial number + insertion code combination. Probably with the ^ notation that we have adopted. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
