John wrote: > I echo Christopher Masi's wow comment on the new animations of JMol v10 > it is getting better and better and more useful all the time ... when will > it end?
It won't end soon ... still a lot of work to do :-) > My only tiny criticism arises from the number of significant digits > shown in the list of vibrational wavenumbers for phenylnitrene. I took the numbers straight out of the Gaussian output field. Q: In all seriousness, what are the units associated with those numbers? Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
