Tim wrote: >>I still want to know what problems people may forsee with having me >>output the <form> and </form> tags as part of explicit >>jmolBeginForm() and jmolEndForm() functions. > > it's faster to type <form></form>. also, easier to give your form a > specific name, id, method, and action.
Well, you won't need an action or method, because thes Jmol forms are not real forms. And I want to assign a name & id if the user does not supply one. > of course, you can pass all of > those as parameters to the opener function, but that's a pain IMHO. > especially if you are trying to use php in conjunction with Jmol and the > js library. > > disclaimer: I am a bit of a control freak. :-) OK, how about this as an alternative. The user must call jmolInitialize() inside a <form> tag within the body of the HTML document. jmolInitialize() will accept several optional arguments, but those are extras which are slightly off-topic. Does that work better for you? Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
