Hi Miguel,
I have been following the development of the isosurfaces with great
interest, and it is very exciting to have the cube support!
The reason one may want to consider deleting a surface may be if it
turns out that having, lets say 10 molecular orbitals with 2 polarities
for each orbital (i.e., 20 isosurfaces) on one atomset, which one would
like to be able to turn on/off base on a javascript....
By the way, the isosurfaces only work on a single atomset (or frame).
Would it be possible, down the line, to be able to set up multiple
frames with isosurfaces and be able to animate them to see molecular
orbitals been broken or made during a reaction?
At the moment the isosurfaces are present for all atomsets, but I think
it may make more sense to have one associated with a single atomset
(since I would assume that in most cases a different atomset would have
atoms in different locations and as such the isosurface of another one
doesn't make sense).
René
On Jul 17, 2005, at 7:01 AM, Miguel wrote:
Q: Is there any reason why someone would want to delete a surface
instead
of turning it off?
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
