> Have you looked into doing stereo via a projection calculation rather than > the rotated-molecule method?
I did not know such a thing existed. > I know the rotation approach is easy to > implement but it is geometrically incorrect and, with today's processors, > it shouldn't be that much of a calculational burden to use the > geometrically correct projection approach. I do not understand how it could be 'geometrically' incorrect ... each of my eyes is a 'camera', and they are viewing from slightly different angles. I suppose that the shadows might be different, but Jmol does not draw any shadows. ... educate me ... :-) > The algorithm is pretty commonly available > these days (I found several pages on the web, e.g. the white papers and > sample files at www.stereographics.com) so it should be pretty easy to pop > it in to replace the current method even if you leave the interface alone > and still pretend it's using degrees. I spent a few minutes looking through the white papers at www.stereographics.com, but was unable to find anything that described the algorithm. Specific URLs to 'tutorials' on stereo projection would be appreciated. Miguel ----- Open Source Molecular Visualization www.jmol.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
