On Tuesday 30 August 2005 19:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, August 30, 2005 1:29 pm, Egon Willighagen said: > > I remember a discussion on this on the list. But cannot find it with > > Google. > > Last August.
Indeed [1]. Thanx. > > Conclusion indeed was that angstrom where to be phased out. > > Not quite. Angstrom measurements are deprecated in all aspects other than > crystallography with nm or pm preferred in those other fields. The > majority of the on-list comments were in favour of an Angstrom default. Right [2]. Egon 1. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2151&max_rows=25&offset=25&style=ultimate&viewmonth=200408 2. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5348298&forum_id=2151 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PhD student on Molecular Representation in Chemometrics Radboud University Nijmegen http://www.cac.science.ru.nl/people/egonw/ GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
