Angel Herraez wrote:
On 5 Sep 2005 at 21:47, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
Ok, I know why, but before fixing it, I need to know if there is a Dd
element (not a chemist at all :) )
No problem, there is not a Dd.
Ok, fixed and committed to CVS.
On 5 Sep 2005 at 21:58, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
While we are it, is there any point adding elements > 109 in Jmol ?
110 - Ds - Darmstadtium
111 - Rg - Roentgenium
Not much point; these elements are very little stable, and so new that
the names sometimes change. Anyway,. they are unlikely to appear in
any molecular coordinates file.
Ok
(anyway, > 111 will be problematic with 3 letters symbols)
3-letter symbols (Uub, Uut, Uuq, etc.) are for elements not yet
discovered,
so no problem at all; once they are isolated or characterized they
receive
a name and a symbol, always 2 letter.
Ok, that was my first guess, but by browsing a little :
Ununbium - Uub - discovered by S. Hofmann, V. Ninov and F.P. Hessbuger
in 1996
??
On 5 Sep 2005 at 22:41, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
Idea: Y is recognized as a token by the compiler (like X, Y, Z)
Aha!
I already solved it, but maybe "select atomno=39" will also do
(...yes, it does, and has full chemical sense).
Ok, cool, but the *.Y not working is probably a bug in the script Compiler
Nicolas
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
