On Sep 27, 2005, at 6:50 , Bob Hanson wrote:
Timothy Driscoll wrote:
related to Bob's comment, I find the following to be a very
interesting read:
<http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-SCRIPT-TECHS/>
regards,
tim
Yes, very informative. Thanks, Tim. I especially appreciate:
<quote>
Note: Techniques in this document are known to contain errors that
we have been unable to correct since the 19 November 2004 Working
Draft since the WCAG WG has been focusing on guidelines and success
criterion for this set of Working Drafts. The purpose of this
document is to receive feedback about the content of the techniques
to ensure that future drafts are more accurate and useful. These
techniques should not be implemented by people attempting to attain
WCAG conformance at this time.
</quote>
For example, there is deprecated code in an example:
<snip>
But I understand, this is a work in progress. Obviously no real
solution to the general problem yet of moving to XHTML with scripting.
yes, definitely a work in progress! but I think (hope?) it gives
some hint for what may happen in the near future, and allow folks to
write code that may be easier to 'upgrade' in the future.
regards,
tim
--
Timothy Driscoll
molvisions - see. grasp. learn.
<http://www.molvisions.com/>
earth:usa:virginia:blacksburg
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
