On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:00 p, Miguel wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 11:32 a, Angel Herraez wrote:
1.- I still think "connect" is more intuitive for changing bond
order, but I am not thinking much in terms of distance as Bob, just
on selecting the atoms I want to connect-disconect-change.
2.- Apart from "set bondmode", we also have there "set bonds" which
does affect rendering only. I already suggested that this might
interfere with the creation of new bond orders.
3.- Let's keep this discussion but slowly.
Angel,
I believe that the implementation in the 10.00.48 prerelease is in
agreement with your mental model of how this should work.
Please work Bob + Tim + others to reach agreement on the most
desirable
behavior.
10.00.48 agrees with my concept of how these commands should work as
well. (I did not know about 'set bonds' in either Chime or Jmol, so
thank you for pointing that out - sorry if it muddled the discussion
somewhat.)
Bob, I will get back to you about your most recent proposal, but
can't until later this evening...
tim
--
Timothy Driscoll em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
molvisions - see. grasp. learn. ph: 919-368-2667
<http://www.molvisions.com/> im: molvisions
usa:virginia:blacksburg tx: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
