Tamas wrote: > but that would mean I would need to copy > my reference structure as separate chain to every model. [snip] > And why load my reference chain 1000 times, when it > is the same all the time?
OK ... now I understand what is going on. When you said '2 chains' I thought that meant that there really are two separate chains, with changes in atom positions along both chains. I now understand that you simply want one model to be static and unchanging. Someone wrote: > if so, you could just add your reference as a separate > model in your multi- model file - no need to add it as > a chain to every model. Jmol has > decent tools to manipulate models. I think that this is the right path for us to pursue. Given the current architecture, I think this is the most effective way to get all the atoms into memory. We can work separately on extending the scripting and/or animation commands to support the functionality that you are looking for. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
