This behavior, though perhaps seemingly strange, is intentional. Dots must be recalculated from scratch any time the atom set is changed so that next-neighbor overlaps can be recalculated. Thus, when any dots are turned off, all dots are turned off. I note that this behavior, though, is inconsistent -- you can turn some dots on, then more dots on, and the recalculation isn't done there. I also see there is a bug in 10.x in relation to this, so I'm interested in working on it.
Make a feature request that is very specific to what you are interested in seeing, and I'll see what I can do. Bob Angel Herraez wrote: >I think I've read about this, but cannot find the post. >It seems (10.2) that "dots off" removes dots from all atoms, not just from the >currently >selected set. >Is this known? Any ideas as to how to tweak it? >Thanks > > > >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
