On 28 Aug 2006 at 13:32, Bob Hanson wrote:
> Hmm. I'm not aware of this as a recommendation and would have to suggest
> not doing this. It's saying that we either have
That trick was posted by someone on the wiki. I understood it as a means to
test locally (using signed applet) pages that will go to the web using the
unsigned applet, and that don't follow the security requirements needed for
local use (as has been said, to have the models together or below the
JmolApplet files). More of an author's trick for testing than a real intention to
have a dual setup.
> By the way, jmolInitialize (in 10.9) now accepts a third option:
> specifying the jar file explicitly:
>
> jmolIntialize(".","JmolApplet.jar")
Bob, how is that compatible with the signedApplet option? Don't you need a
second empty parameter in your example?
Annemarie, to me the easiest solution is to put JmolApplet files at the top,
root folder in your CD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
