I think both options are reasonable, but I tend to prefer keeping the name as Jmol.js.
El 14 Sep 2006 a las 11:03, Bob Hanson escribió: [snip] > Advantages to keeping "Jmol.js" (add more if you think of them) > > -- inserts directly into user sites I think this is key. > Advantages to using the name "Jmol-11.js" > > -- clearly distinguishes capability anytime anyone refers to it This is good, but applies only for discussions. > -- there are some major additions not present in Jmol.js Not some, but many! But, as far as I know, all present in v10.2 are also in 11.0, so no problme with existing code. > -- reduced chance of mixing these up on user sites The applet files could be mixed up unadvertedly. I think anyone will change the full set of files in one go, little chance to do wrong. > -- allows experienced users to decide for themselves what to do Yes, like editing several dozen pages --even automatically--. This works also the other way round: they can rename to Jmol-11.js if they wish. Not-so-experienced users will benefit from less change. > -- sourceForge pages need revision anyway Yes, we have to cope with that anyway. Some of those revisions are on their way. Suggestions are welcome, by the way. E.g., anything that would be interesting to move from the wiki? · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Dr. Angel Herraez Dep. Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular, Universidad de Alcala E-28871 Alcala de Henares (Madrid), Spain fax: +34-91 885 45 85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
