Re: [Jmol-users] surfaces and JVXL files

Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:10:57 -0700

OK, I was completely wrong on this one and I withdraw the question. The surface difference was in fact due to a version difference, which I completely missed and thought I had accounted for. The versions do come at us fast, but still one should be able to keep them straight. Sorry to have posted the list with this.

Frieda


On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Frieda Reichsman wrote:

The surfaces really do come out looking different, even using exactly the same file (1mbo.cif). to see this, compare the surface generated at the test page,
under the category "isosurface select(xxx) ignore(not xxx) sasurface"

with the one generated by clicking the first button at

Now granted I am using 10.9.70 and the test page is using 10.9.72,

///////////////////////////////////////////


Frieda Reichsman, PhD

Molecules in Motion

Interactive Molecular Structures

http://www.moleculesinmotion.com


///////////////////////////////////////////


 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to