Egon Willighagen wrote:
> 
> What do you want to validate? For reasonable bond lengths? That is, the sort 
> of things WHAT_CHECK/_IF does?

You're right. I had to be more specific. Reasonable bond lengths is one of the
criteria. But first of all i'm interested in more primitive information:
1. is the JmolApplet able to load a given molecule? And if so,
2. what information are available from the Resolver about the input?

Right now i managed to create a list of all relevant "files" and did some manual
spot tests by generating HTML pages (driven from cocoon :-P) where both 
rendering
methods are displayed alongside (Chime/left, JmolApplet/right).
In several cases the java console gives quite detailed information of what is
going wrong with a structure or script statement.

Now, my batch test should do this with all affected files where those logging
information went to a crude logfile for further analysis.
Is it "org.jmol.adapter.smarter.Resolver" who do the job?


> 
> An option here would be to use the CDK which has a validation engine, which 
> already does a number of checks, and is easily extended. It could be combined 
> with Jmol in Bioclipse, to visualize problems and errors.

Thanks, i'll take a look at this. Do You know if Bioclipse has batch job 
capabilities?

EJ
-- 
Eike Jordan  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

| FIZ CHEMIE BERLIN
| Franklin Str. 11               ------    ,__o
| 10587 Berlin                  ------   _-\_<,
|                              ------   (+)/'(+)
| Tel. : 0049-30-39977 214


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to