Thanks, Bob I will wait for others to express their opinion, but I want to clarify now my point of view on point nr.2:
> >2.- "Style" : I would rather have this order: > 3) structures seem to naturally follow atoms and bonds as "bigger" > considerations To me, both Scheme and Structures are quick options affecting global rendering, while Atoms, Bonds, etc are more detailed, specific, need a combination of them. That's why I like the first 2 together at the top. Plus, a new Scheme > None would be useful (e.g. to show structures only; right now, you have to deactivate Atoms, then Bonds). We already have Structures > None, which is good. Regarding []"Perspective Depth" and "Stereographic >>", I prefer having them at the bottom since they are (to me at least, and likely to novice users) less-frequently used options. > >3.- There is "Style > Structure > CartoonRockets", but no "Color" for them. > > > Cartoon rockets are just a variant of "cartoons" so they are colored > with the "color cartoon" command. OK. Didn't realize that ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
