don't get me wrong -- I think unicode is great - just probably not the thing for superscripts and subscripts. I know -- you want the superscripts SMALLER - well, a future improvement, I think.
Angel Herraez wrote: >On 9 May 2007 at 17:28, Frieda Reichsman wrote: > > >>OK, my guess is that you did this with several echos, changing font sizes >>between, and set the >> >> > >No, no. that's a real label, attached to atomno=3. I wouldn't cheat you. >Just the wonders of Unicode. > >I've already put the code in a previous post, although Bob seems not to like >either the code or >the characters themselves :-) Maybe the consequences of being an English >speaker, but we >just can't live without accented chars :-)) > >How about label "\u263B" to mark your favorite atom? > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
