Hi Pim Jmol is an open source project, and this basically means that anyone can contribute to its development. As you point out, keeping documentation is a hard task, and any help is welcome.
> Jmol doesn't have the in-script help like rasmol has I guess, but at > the moment having that would probably just mean another heap of work > to keep it updated. If you compare the rate of growth of RasMol vs. that of Jmol you can see why there is not such a thing. > I really think that it would be a good thing for jmol to have a single > clear structure in the documentation. For a versatile program like > this, with the amount of features it currently has, it is very > important to give the users clear access to these features. Agreed. Can you devote some time to help? The Wiki is the easy place for anyone to collaborate, but that is not happening too often. > The > surface page is an example of such a solution. Rigt, and it took me quite a lot of time to build it. A pleasure, but not something one can do every week. > Are there already plans to make a more structured documentation > and tutorial? No, but we all would love to have such. You can start those plans if you like. > Is there a way to integrate this into the wiki-idea, so > it can be done with the help of user contributions? As I said, the wiki is open to anyone to go and write there. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
