David Leader wrote: > > plus the URL: http://www.jmol.org/ > 1. The url redirects automatically to the sourceforge url. Reviewers > might not like this.
You may have a point, but to me, jmol.org is easy to grasp by anyone, easier to write without typos and to remember, so I quite prefer that to SF url. Plus we have www.jmol.org, wiki.jmol.org, firstglance.jmol.org that by one means or another should be maintained in the future and redirect to wherever is the real stuff. I guess Miguel can comment on this, as I understand he is responsible of the domain registration and DNS business in between redirections. Anyway, I see no problem if you prefer to use jmol.sourceforge.net for the citation, as it is very clear. > 2. The title doesn't appear anywhere on the page. It might be better This is a good point. I think I can take care of this. > "Jmol: An open-source Java viewer for three-dimensional molecular > structures" > > That way the 'chemical' doesn't discourage the protein people. I had also thought of that, but didn't want to change existing things. OK, if no more suggestions come, I will set "Jmol: An open-source Java viewer for three-dimensional molecular structures" as the webpage title. Despite the current lack of descriptive title, Google doesn't do badly: "jmol" ==> first hit "molecular viewer" ==> second hit "molecular viewer java" ==> 17th hit (due to existing "Java Molecular Viewer") "open source molecular viewer" ==> 2nd hit, after OpenRasMol "free molecular viewer" ==> 7th hit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
