Hi All,
I saw this proposed change on the list and have now seen it on the
web site. Initially I let it slide but the more I think about it the
more I think I was wrong.
"Jmol - an open-source Java viewer for three-dimensional
chemical structures" - this is accurate.
Molecular structures is not accurate. Bob uses quartz as an example,
there are lovely pages showing zeolites, graphite, diamond, ionic
solids e.g. NaCl, metals, etc. etc. These are not molecules but they
are chemicals.
I don't think we should accept the idea that chemical is a "dirty"
word. It is widely understood and appropriate.
How about "Jmol - an open-source Java viewer for three-dimensional
chemical and biological structures" ?
All the best
Nick
--
WWW Pages: http://www.liv.ac.uk/Chemistrywww/Staff/greeves.html
Tel: +44 (0)151-794-3506 (3500 secretary)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
