pim schravendijk wrote: >That is an impressive program! But as far as I can see, the builder in >that suite is also using the Jmol interface. Porting the building >capacity to Jmol shouldn't be too much of a problem then, should it? > > > No plans to add a builder to Jmol.
>On 9/4/07, Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>no plans for this as part of Jmol itself. See, however, Molecular >>Workbench: http://xeon.concord.org:8080/modeler/faq.html#jmol >> >> > > > > -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College Northfield, MN http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr If nature does not answer first what we want, it is better to take what answer we get. -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
