Jmol users, I'm ready to tackle two big Jmol feature requests:
1) automatic conversion 2D to 3D 2) minimal molecular mechanics support Personally, I don't see these as pushing Jmol in the wrong direction. (2) is necessary for (1), and (1) is a visualization issue. You may disagree. Feel free to chime in. My goal would be to add one or two additional optional packages. They would be part of the application but would not load into the applet unless used there. We know how to do that now, and it appears to be quite successful. I'm interested in a) What people think about this idea. b) What people think about the magnitude of the problem. c) Reasonable limitations we might implement. d) What people know about code that is already out there in any language that we could adopt. e) Who wants to help. Bob Hanson -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College Northfield, MN http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr If nature does not answer first what we want, it is better to take what answer we get. -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
