Certain empirical cases published at “StrucClues” ( http://strucclue.ornl.gov) 
identify pairs of tertiary substructures A and B, where it is intuitively 
obvious that A is a more “compact” version of B.
 
Not a “smaller” version of B, in the sense that A lacks a helix or strand that 
is present in B.
 
But rather, a more “compact”  version of B, in the sense that A has less 
residues per helix, and/or less residues per strand, and/or less residues per 
turn.
 
Since such pairs of tertiary substructures were identified using a novel 
methodology (SCILD) that does not depend on any degree of primary structure 
sequence homology between substructures A and B, it is impossible to do a 
principled structural alignment of A and B using gap insertions because there 
is no principled reason for putting the gaps one place rather than another.  
(See StrucClues site for explication of the SCILD methodology.)
 
So … under the assumption that StrucClues cases of this type actually do 
reflect some “real” or “valid” aspect of tertiary structure, it would seem that 
the only way to “align” substructure A with 
substructure B would be by “scaling up” A or “scaling down” B.  By “scaling 
up”, I mean artificially
increasing the distiance between any two residues r(i) and r(i+1) of A, without 
changing the orientation of r(i) with respect to r(i+1).  (And vice-versa, for 
“scaling down”.)
 
How easy would it be to add such a “scaling” capability to JMol displays?
 
Assuming again, of course, that it is empirically defensible to do such scaling 
(based on the kinds of cases accumulating at StrucClues)?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to