Robert Hanson wrote: > One more thought on this: What about an option that allows the replacement > of the Jar file but first prompts the user for an OK (using JavaScript > prompt() ) and explains why this might be an issue? If the user says it is > OK, then the Jar file is used? >
Accepting should not be the default and then I think it should be ok. If it is integrated the possible consequences should be pointed out clearly in the documentation of 'Jmol.js'. And it should be easily removable by people who don't like to take the risk. Regards, Rolf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
