Understood Bob. I think having a parameter for it would be good and I think the default should be: multipleBondSpacing = 0.35 multipleBondCylinderThickness = 0.75 (or however you want to code it)
Rich On [2010-Sep-10] Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu> wrote: > This isn't thickness, it's distance apart. We could add a parameter for > that, though. > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:42 AM, <r...@ellerbach.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, September 10, 2010 9:19 am, Robert Hanson wrote: > > > that can be experimented with at > > > http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-12/new.htm?topic=11 > > > > > > I think this could be a new default. Let's talk about it. > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Uploading now a slight modification of this idea: > > >> > > >> # new feature: multipleBondSpacing > > >> # set multipleBondSpacing = -1 (default, varies with viewing angle) > > >> # set multipleBondSpacing = -0.5 (half that distance; varies with > > >> viewing > > >> angle) > > >> # set multipleBondSpacing = 0.35 (positive ==> fixed multiple bond > > >> spacing, Angstroms) > > > > I like the choices Bob. I think that the bond thickness for multiple bonds > > should be less than that of a single bond. It looks more pleasing to the > > eye, in my opinion, if they are set at about 75% of the single-bond > > thickness. This then gives a bit more play in the value for the new > > multipleBondSpacing value. > > > > Rich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
