Angel and Adam,
I've been working under the assumption the set bondpicking true sets bond
picking default behavior to changing bond order with the default order setting:
set picking assignBond_0
The call back information on this is of the following format (for ethane):
bond [{0}] "0"
Bug or not, I must admit that being able to intercept a bond click without
action would be nice. One problem with the current callback in this regard is
that you need the connection table - i.e. no connected atom info in the
callback.
Otis
--
Otis Rothenberger
Department of Chemistry
Illinois State University
Normal, IL 61790-4160
http://chemagic.org
----------------------------------------
From: "Angel Herráez" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 12:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] Bond picking woes
Hello Adam
There is no reason why the bond should be deleted. This must be a
bug.
Please provide details of the exact version of Jmol you are using
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
