Jorg,

I'm pretty sure the problem is that we haven't included reading occupation 
numbers into the GAMESS reader yet.  I keep meaning to work on that, but it 
hasn't been a high priority.  GAMESS doesn't specify occupation numbers, just 
the total number of electrons in most of its calculations, so we will have to 
do a little counting...  I always do that manually and want my students to 
think about it, which is part of why I haven't pushed to get it done.

Jonathan
On Nov 15, 2011, at 9:03 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> From: J?rg Sa?mannshausen <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Jmol-users] MO HOMO problem with GAMESS output
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I am having a problem with a GAMESS output when I want to draw the HOMO/LUMO 
> orbitals. I stumbled over it by chance when I was looking into the HOMO/LUMO 
> of a large molecule and the problem can be repeated with a smaller molecule 
> like water. 
> I have attached the URL of the logfile from the GAMESS calculation
> <http://sassy-design.de/tmp/water-SP.log.gz> as well as the pictures 
> of the HOMO, generated that way:
> frame 1.1; isosurface cutoff 0.05 mo homo fill translucent 0.5
> <http://sassy-design.de/tmp/homo.png>
> and mo 5, generated that way:
> frame 1.1; isosurface cutoff 0.05 mo 5 fill translucent 0.5
> http://sassy-design.de/tmp/mo5.png
> 
> As the list does not really like email attachments (for good reasons), in 
> brief: 
> MO5 should be the HOMO and when you draw it that way:
> frame 1.1; isosurface cutoff 0.05 mo 5 fill translucent 0.5
> you get the correct answer, i.e. that 'burger shaped' orbital with the two 
> lobes being the bread and the molecule being the meat. :-)
> (see above link)
> 
> However, using that command here:
> frame 1.1; isosurface cutoff 0.05 mo homo fill translucent 0.5
> i.e. calling the HOMO directly, gives a different and wrong picture. It looks 
> more like higher, unoccupied orbital to me.
> (see above link)
> 
> I am using jmol-12.0.49. I also tried the version Bob suggested in his email 
> from the  22 Jun 2011 with the same results.
> 
> Anybody got any ideas? That seems to be a bug to me, at least with the GAMESS 
> output.
> 
> All the best from a foggy London
> 
> J?rg
> 
> -- 
> *************************************************************
> J?rg Sa?mannshausen
> University College London
> Department of Chemistry
> Gordon Street
> London
> WC1H 0AJ 
> 
> email: [email protected]
> web: http://sassy.formativ.net
> 
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

                         Dr. Jonathan H. Gutow
Chemistry Department                                 [email protected]
UW-Oshkosh                                           Office:920-424-1326
800 Algoma Boulevard                                 FAX:920-424-2042
Oshkosh, WI 54901
                 http://www.uwosh.edu/facstaff/gutow






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to