OK. Go for it! I don't recommend starting with the super compressed
JavaScript business, though. Keep it readable. But the idea, I think, is
that we would have something like

var jmol = new Jmol()

and go from there, right?

That would be great.

Bob



On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Paul Pillot <
paul.pil...@ac-orleans-tours.fr> wrote:

> I'm willing to try !
> -Paul
> Le 8 avr. 2012 à 17:29, Robert Hanson a écrit :
>
> > definitely should be done. Then one could be much more specific about
> which applet you are working with, and everything would go a lot more
> smoothly. Volunteers!
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
> Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
> Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>



-- 
Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave.
Northfield, MN 55057
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
phone: 507-786-3107


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to