On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Daniel Aioanei <[email protected]> wrote:

> What is the relationship between the isosurface of a set of atoms and
> that of a subset of the atoms? I kind of expected that the latter be a
> subset of the former one, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
> Indeed, by selecting only some atoms, in fact none of the triangles I
> get appear in the isosurface of the full molecule. For comparing two
> triangles I compare the vertex positions and values, sorted in a
> canonical order, so that two triangles with permuted vertices are
> still considered equal.
>
>
The isosurface routine will select a grid that spans the set of atoms. So
if there are fewer atoms, the grid will be different.


> What I need is to get the potential-mapped sasurface partitioned by
> groups of atoms. If I select one group of atoms at a time and compute
> their sasurface, will that correctly cover the whole molecule? Is
> there any guarantee that 1) the group sasurfaces do not overlap (as
> long as the groups constitute a valid "partition" of the molecule,
> i.e., they do not overlap and together they contain all atoms of the
> molecule), and 2) considering them together will result in a surface
> covering the full molecule, without any "cracks"?
>
>
I think you need to work with the surface as a whole. If necessary, you can
create two identical isosurfaces -- they will have identical vertex arrays.
Then at least on one, you could do this:

set isosurfacepropertySmoothing false
isosurface s1 SASURFACE MAP PROPERTY atomindex

Now the values for that surface give you the atom index for the properties
of the other isosurface. Although, when I do that I'm seeing a very thin
band for one of my atoms that should be attributable to two others. Not
sure what's going on there....

Bob



>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>



-- 
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
Chair, Chemistry Department
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to